The strange situation between Cowboys and Line Baker Micha Parson is more strange and more complicated.
Cowboys believe that they have a dialogue with Parson in March, which is based on conversation and understanding. On Tuesday, Jones was asked about the failure to reduce the deal, which he believes Mika agreed in March.
“I bought Dallas Cowboy with the handshake“Jones said, through the Thethletic.com, through June Machota.” It took about 30 30 seconds. I gave the number, made hands, the details we worked later. The fact is, one of the details included a lot of money and I had to turn a coin on it. But the basic, ‘I’m buying and you are going to sell it to me for that limit’, it’s done. And they are done with eyes and hands.
“That’s all you think, I think I talk to the people I talk to. Let’s leave it. There is no question that in the case of a player’s deal, you have to keep in writing. We do all the parties. We have a written contract, yet we are talking about it.”
Jones has mentioned the fact that Parsons already have a contract. Technically, this is the fifth year option that the collective bargaining deal has given the team the right to exercise.
Why do Jones talk about it? This is its foulback, its secure port. Parsons are “under contract” for 2025 at a salary of $ 2025. And Jones is dominant. It will prefer to ride it, forcing Parson to take the risk of injury this year, while the agreement will also be kicked by 2026, when the Cowboy can place the Parson through the franchise tag.
Why don’t Jones want to wait? At this point, the market will not be higher than the time in 2025, the Stellers Line Baker TJ Watt has made that number of millions every year. So if the Cowboy can maintain the parson at 24 million and then pay $ 41.1 million or $ 42 million in 2026, he has forced him to risk long -term injury over his first round of two years of his first round, a long -term contract.
Teams discuss hundreds of agreements. The best players of the best players talk about them, two, maybe three,, then accept the deal with them or the survivors. The best approach to the teams is to find a way to get the player’s career elimination (or a career -limit) injury risk. It protects the team from a rare situation, which results in the worst year as a result of the additional year spent under the current agreement that does not make the player as much as it was.
Each person’s player is less likely to be. Over time, this will inevitably happen to someone. That is why the team prefers to hedge on its stake.
This is the game Jonas is currently playing. If Parson refuses to write the agreement that Jones believes the two sides agreed in March, it is an alternative to Parsons to pay their current agreement. That is why Jones continues to mention that Mika is under the agreement.
The question arises whether, when the week rotates, Parson will accept the best offer of cowboys (NamelyThe contract he agreed in March) or playing the last year of his deceased deal. If Parson refuses to accept the team’s best offer, the question arises whether he will ignore the hardness of his waist or play football under the fifth year of his contract.
It is a microorcum of broader imbalance between the administration and the wages. Teams know that football players want to play football. Jones is trusting Parsons who want to play the team’s offer or play for a well -playing market for $ 24 million.
And if Parson wants to pay more than the cowards, the cowboys will not like anything other than waiting for 2026 to give it. Or maybe up to 2027. Which forces Parson to avoid serious injury for two years.
