When George Russell was not behind his steps behind a safety car in Canada, why was the Oscar pastry punished in Silverstend? What is the difference that was in a wet and that’s why the merit is limited? – NIP
This is a question that the pastry was clearly asking for herself after the British Grand Prix, even if she did not say so in many words.
Stevers’ opinion is a team that teams and drivers are asking permanently, and it looks like a contradiction on his face.
Both incidents were very similar. In Canada, Russell brakes and Max Verstepen passed it. In Silvestone, PESTA did the same with the same result.
In Canada, Stevers did not take any action, and the Red Bill rejected the protest. In Silvestone, the PESTA lost to the win as a result of a 10 -second fine.
However, there were some differences. Brake pressure is applied, while the back of the safety car was more than double Russell for the braking event. And the situation was different – instead of drying, wet – with less recovery.
Verstapin made it clear that he did not see the events that are different.
After the Sunday race, he was asked if he believed to be penalized.
“The thing is, now a few times with me, such a scenario.” “I just find it strange that suddenly the Oscar is now the first person to receive 10 seconds.”
Because what did Russell do in Canada did it matter?
“Okay, to the stewards, yes,” the Wordendean replied.
The PEST said that he felt that he had done everything within the rules, and he said he was unfortunate when he was brakes when the safety car lights came out to identify the resume – when drivers are not allowed to put the wrong brakes, and no other driver can be able to risk.
Red Bill Team Principal Christian Horner said: “I was not surprised to find it a fine. That’s what you expected.”
Andrea Stella, the principal of the McLaren team, said she thinks the fine is “very tough” and she will discuss it with the steward.
He said that McLaren had spoken during the race that he should be seen after that.
“I think we should have checked in detail the opinion of the drivers involved,” he said. “We should have examined why the safety car was called so long and then mixed with all the elements that the decision could be as fair as possible.”
